by Gary DeVaney

According to Pastor Arnold Murray's selected C&Vs, the Serpent, who Pastor Murray insists is Satan, seduced Eve sexually and then Eve tempted Adam, who joined in. Ergo, two sperm-seeds provided for two boys, one by Satan, whose offspring, Cain, was the first-born and his twin, Able, Adam's son, was born second.

This is the "original sin" according to both Pastor Arnold Murray and his son, Pastor Dennis Murray. Both strongly suggest this is the "Original Sin" by chapter and verse evidence, but both pastor's usually tactfully evade the juicy details. Both strongly infer that Eve "shared" the "forbidden fruit" with Adam - that Adam performed a homosexual act with Satan. Over the years, they have pondered other options but they always come back to Adam and Eve's sharing of sex with Satan.

To spell it out for Pastor Murray: Satan's sperm is the "forbidden fruit". If Eve shared the "forbidden fruit" with Adam, and Adam did "eat"  (partake), then Adam had a homosexual experience with Satan.  

Pastor Murray preaches the homosexual act on his television broadcasts - but begs off going into detail on any one broadcast for he considers it is super "touchy". Murray also does not want to implicate that God did sloppy work and made errors in His so-called "creation".

That God's first "created man" had a homosexual experience is far beyond what any traditional Judeo-Christian-Islamic believer could handle.

This heinous "in-total-control", "know-it-all" God also provided that the Serpent (Satan) be in the garden with His new totally ignorant / innocent Human creations. That's like putting candy in your 2 year-old's crib and telling the child not to eat it. Based on hindsight, for God to allow Satan to be in the Garden of Eden with the ignorant and naive Adam and Eve is a heinous agenda in itself. This turns out to be God's bad judgment. God repented. God orchestrated a heinous agenda and a most super- determinable incompetence.

Redundantly, if "the buck stops here" with God, integrity would insist that this whole scenario is all God's fault. "Free-will" for these newly created human beings cannot apply by any stretch of fantasy or integrity. Besides, if just one human being on planet Earth truly has "free will", God is not in total control. If God is not in control, God is not omnipotent. Thus, the "perfect" God-myth dominos tend to fall.

Pastor Murray often does "go where no man has gone before" but all the combined C&Vs of the Old and New Testaments he selects seems to make his claims accurate.   It certainly makes more sense than a non-defined "apple" being considered to be the "forbidden fruit" that contributed to "original sin".

For more on Pastor Arnold Benjamin Murray:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Murray

In a debate, some believers quickly get tired, frightened or suspiciously bored when this Biblical scenario is offered. Some just preach nonsense, threaten eternal-damnation, arrogantly announce that they refuse to "cast their pearls before swine", claim a fantasy victory and quit - never to be heard from again.

Would you care to invite your clergy to assist you in investigating the "Original Sin"? The more the merrier.

If you want to see clergy squirm, if front of believers, ask them: What are the details of "The Original Sin"? "Who specifically was Cain's father?" If you push for specific Biblical answers in public, clergy may invited you to leave their church.