If there is an error
or a lack of homework concerning Luke 19:27 - let’s examine it.
Upon request of His disciples in Matthew 13:36, Jesus
spoke in parables.
What is a "parable" according to the dictionary?
Parable: A short, simple story from which a moral
lesson can be drawn. It is usually an allegory. To represent, by fiction, a fable. To
compare.
Luke 19:27 Jesus
Christ said to His disciples: "But those, mine enemies, which would not that I should reign
over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. KJV
What happened to Jesus' teaching to: "Love thy enemy?"
Luke 19:27 Jesus
said: "And, as for those who would not have Me be King over them, bring them before Me and slay them."
(A composite of
Catholic and other Luke 19:27 versions of scripture.)
Who is speaking
to His disciples in Luke 19:27? It is Jesus Christ - is it not? Yes.
If not, who, by
name, do you say is speaking?
Jesus, to explain Himself, uses
a parable of a "noble-man", who is expanding his kingdom. Wasn't Jesus expanding His kingdom? If that is not the case,
what is the purpose of Jesus' parable? What other individual, by name, does the New Testament promote to be
expanding his kingdom within the context of this specific parable?
If these C&Vs confuse truth-seekers,
what grade does Jesus get as a teacher?
Review:
Did Jesus Christ speak in parables? Yes.
Why
did Jesus use parables?
A myth
is a human attempt to explain our world by means of a fictional story. Jesus used myths to teach and describe Himself
to His disciples as to who He was and what He and His agenda was about. Jesus used fictitious stories, myths, parables,
and allegories to explain Himself to the World. Jesus also used these fictitious stories to explain what He required from
His disciples and from all mankind.
What moral lesson did Jesus teach in Luke 19:27?
Voltaire wrote: "Christianity is the most ridiculous, the most absurd and bloody religion that
has ever infected the world."
Voltaire, Sir - that took balls!
Jesus' moral parable explains to you that if you
don't allow Jesus Christ to be your King, authority, ruler, over you, you are to be slain.
Jesus' parallel lesson in Luke 19:27 is: If you
don't accept Jesus Christ as your savior, you will suffer eternal torment. What moral lessons! What an evil tyrant!
What a monster!
Redundantly,
Luke 19:27 parallels what eternal-salvation or eternal-damnation is about. If you don't obey and serve God and accept
Jesus Christ as your savior - instead of being slain - you will suffer eternal-damnation.
What was Jesus’
specific moral point of the parable? It was to teach you that if you do not follow, serve and obey Jesus / God, you
would suffer eternal-damnation. That’s even more disgusting and cruel than just slaying you.
What Christian would
say that Jesus is not God? If you claim that Jesus Christ is NOT God - are you sure you are a true, believing Christian?
Then Jesus states His "evil" agenda to His disciples
in:
Mark 4:11-12 Jesus said: ... But, to those outside everything
comes in parables so that they look and see but not perceive and hear and listen but do not understand,
in order that thy may not be converted and be forgotten.
Knowing that Jesus Christ said this, and that Jesus did
not want many people saved, do you feel more like you do now than you did before?
Judgment
day is when God judges if you have served Him on His terms during your life on Earth. God's judgment
determines if you will be "saved" to then serve, grovel, worship and praise at the feet
of God and Jesus 24/7 for eternity.
Those who are not
"saved" will suffer eternal-torment according to the book of Revelation. However, Ezekiel 25 indicates that after Jesus comes
back at the "end-time" and slaughters all humanity and then after the thousand year "millennium" followed by "Judgment-Day", if
not selected by God, you will expire, as Satan expires, by turning into ashes from within.
God is documented
to kill millions of human beings in the Old Testament because they did not obey and act as if God was King over them. (See:
"The God Murders" on this website) If Jesus is God, the statement fits. The unnamed nobleman / king is Jesus Christ, Himself.
God was angry when the Israelites choose a human king over them - as God wanted to be King over them.
If you don’t
convert to Christianity and, in essence, make Jesus Christ king over you, you will go to Hell. The parable fits Jesus being
the unnamed nobleman / King. What other known king could it be? Every C&V points to Jesus Christ and no one else.
Christianity demands one God, one Savior and a new
Christian "One World Order".
I’ve debated
these factors before and welcome anyone to refute each and every point by C&V documentation.
What is Jesus Christ's
point - if He is not describing Himself and what He expects?
I view that
Jesus Christ stated this parable about Himself. It dramatically displays the cruelty that He, as God, projects for those God
sends to Hell-Fire / Eternal-Damnation or expiration. That is the parallel agenda that makes it a documented parable.
Who else would you
want the king to be - and why? If the king described is unknown or not important - than the parable is wasted -
and Jesus proves to be a confusing and poor teacher. It has to be describing Jesus Christ to have contextual
meaning.
Gloria Steinem: "By the year 2000, we will, I hope,
raise our children to believe in human potential, not God."
What one
believer who you know would be impacted if sent to this site?
Any corrections, feedback or comments?
Thank You!
For speaking engagements
e-mail us at: